Members of Trinity’s elected student Honor Committee held an honor symposium on Monday, January 24 in Chapel with a panel of faculty guests for an open dialogue about strategies to help maintain honor and integrity in the classroom. After opening with a Methodist prayer for honesty, the student members of the committee spoke candidly to the assembled student body, noting that honor violations tend to spike in the stressful winter months.
Tucker Tetterton ’25 reminded students that the Honor Committee exists to help students grow and learn, not to punish them. “As a student-run organization we are on your side. You all elected us to support you,” he said. “If you do violate the Honor Code in any way, we want to help you realize your mistake and grow from it.”
Faculty panelists included Elizabeth Kelley, IB Diploma Programme Coordinator, Sarah Scriber, English teacher, and Torey Burston ’12, Student Life Coordinator.
“I feel like it's what makes us Trinity,” said Burston about the importance of the school’s Honor Code. “It's the reason why we don't have hall passes. We trust you to be where you are, but it also gets you ready for what's next in life.” As a coach, Burston compared cheating in class to cheating in the weight room or on the practice field. “If you cheat that rep, if you decide to make a short-term decision, it may not cost you right then and there, but down the road it will end up catching up with you.”
Other panelists connected honorable decision making with strong mental health and open communication. “You have a lot of resources here and people who care about you,” said Schriber. “Whether it's the school counselor, your teachers, your advisor, there are all kinds of people here who want to support you.” Schriber suggested that students make a game plan ahead of time. “Maybe take a moment now to think about who's that person you talked to when things seem like they're going south.”
“Being honorable doesn't mean being perfect,” added Schriber. “It means making the right choices.”
Matthew Waidelich ’26, committee member, asked the panel to talk about honorable ways to use the powerful tools brought about by artificial intelligence (AI). “Because it's a wonderful tool and has a lot of great capabilities,” he acknowledged, “but how can we use it so that we also learn the material ourselves?”
Noting the ubiquity of these tools, even among educators, Kelley stressed the importance of clarity and boundaries ahead of time. “I've had good luck in my classroom talking to students about when to use it, how to use it, what the prompt should be,” she said. “It’s really about trying to be as transparent as possible in the teacher-student relationship.”
Schriber concurred, adding, “I can't stress enough that if you're unsure as to whether or not you should be using a certain technology, you better reach out to that teacher before you use it.” In her English classes, for example, Schiurber said she could see the tools being used for editing “as long as we keep a record of it and before and after,” but never to generate ideas.
Comparing this moment in education with the emergence of spell-check in the 1990s, Schriber expressed optimism. “Back then, a lot of English teachers were like, oh no!, now our students won't be able to spell anymore,” she said. “But now it's more like a tool in your tool belt… I'm hoping that these AI platforms can move [in this direction too]. What makes me nervous about it is students using it to replace critical thinking.”
The panelists all agreed that true learning and skill building come from doing the work and going through the steps, despite the temptation of shortcuts.
“Sometimes cheating really can feel like the easiest thing in the world,“ said Liam O’Neil ’25, Honor Committee member, “but there's always an alternative… sending out an email or just talking to a teacher about an extension is going to be a lot easier than going to the honor council.”
“No matter who you are, really no one is above mistakes,” said O’Neil, “but the best we can hope to do is grow from them.”